E2K ||Editorial ||Fiction ||Poetry ||Features || Stacks ||Archives ||Submission Guide ||Masthead || NA
|
Published
by & © NetAuthor.org 2001
Robert Marcom, Publisher/Owner Rhonna Robbins-Sponaas, Editor-in-Chief Sabina Becker, Poetry Editor Keith Deshaies, Editor-at-Large Jason Nolan, Editor-at-Large Julia Brown, Staff Writer Dan Knestaut, Associate Moderator Walt Wellborn, Webmaster ISSN:1529-1146 |
Stacks
Crafting
Plot: Intuition vs Outlines
by Shane
Wiebe
You're standing at the foot of a mountain and wonder how to take your first step. Do you pull out a map to help plot your course or do you ditch the map, step out in faith and trust your instincts? As you can well imagine, writing a novel is much like scaling a mountain. The task is fierce, with many unexpected turns, near tragedies, frustrating standstills, and miles of uphill sluggin'. But part of the thrill that comes from climbing is the anticipation that fills us as we press toward the next ridge. And then the next. And the next. What scenic wonder will fill our eyes as we gaze into the valley or across to the adjacent peak? Similarly, the thrill in crafting a novel comes as we put flesh to each piece of an intelligent story line. So herein lies the question: If plot describes the internal logic or sequence of events that leads the characters from their situations and attitudes at the beginning of the problem to their situations and attitudes when the effort to solve the problem is finally over, then how does an intuitive writer start? How does a more structured writer start? What tactics can each use to see their story come to life? Let us first understand the essence of each. Intuition, as it pertains to writing fiction, can be as nebulous as it sounds. It stems from the belief that stories pretty much make themselves. The writer's job is to create a situation, watch what takes place between characters, and write down what is seen. Proponents of this approach would advise: Just start the novel and see where it takes you. It's a "destination unknown" (or partially known) approach that can be freeing for writers who don't like shoving themselves into a box, so to speak, but can also be frightening for new writers. The sky may be the limit, say the latter, but too much room to move can be just as debilitating. Outlines, however, occupy the opposite end of the creative spectrum. Here we face more structure, guidance, and pre-thought. Outlines take on many forms, from the meager to the massive, and provide a skeleton, or launching pad, from which to build ideas. They typically consist of a list and sketch of primary characters and a plot skeleton which also incorporates: 1) a believable and sympathetic central character's urgent and difficult problem; 2) his attempts to resolve the problem, which fail and make his situation more grave; 3) the crisis, his last chance to win; and 4) the successful resolution, brought about by means of the central character's own courage, ingenuity, etc. For new writers, outlines provide security. For others, a straightjacket. Stephen King, an outspoken opponent of pre-planning plot, asserts that "plotting and the spontaneity of real creation aren't compatible." He adds, plot is "clumsy, mechanical, and anti-creative. Plot is the good writer's last resort and the dullard's first choice. The story which results from it is apt to feel artificial and labored." Having tried King's approach for my novel, Into the Eyes of Payne, I can attest to his proposed sense of freedom. In many instances one scene seemed to naturally lead into another, gain momentum, and spontaneously give birth to new ideas, natural-sounding dialogue, and flavorful description. The drawbacks, of course, included countless dead ends and meandering braids that found no connection. Just as irritating were the occasions when the story grew to be too large, almost tumor-like. Too many characters and a complex story line that expanded beyond my control, an ailment which, all too frequently, required expensive and time-consuming surgery. Having also worked from an outline, I can see how they might be cumbersome to some and liberating to others. Cumbersome because ideas change. You may have the slickest outline prepared at the onset of your endeavor, but an idea may come to you midstream which will force you to reinvent the remainder (or large portions) of your story. This can also be both frustrating and counterproductive. But the liberating part of an outline comes in the ease of filling in the scenes. Especially when you are confident that your plot line provides the reader with as many surprises as it does conflict and fullness of character. My intent is not to sway you this way or that. However, I would highly advise you to decide your plan of attack beforehand – even if it means starting the book with a partial outline and then relying on your intuition to complete it. Regardless of your plan of attack, I would also encourage you to consider the following before you start:
When you have these elements in place you're ready to go. Let me rephrase: intuitive plotters are ready to go. Structured writers still need to prepare their outline. References
Imboden, Durant. "Character vs. Plot." http://writing.org/html/a_char_vs_plot.htm
King, Stephen. 2000. On Writing: A Memoir of the Craft. Scribner:
New York, NY.
Knight, Damon. "Plot." http://www.efn.org/~dknight/plot/
Norman, Marsha. "Plots: They Come in Pairs." http://www.vcu.edu/artweb/playwriting/plot.html
Phillips, Melanie Anne, and Chris Huntley. Dramatica: A New Theory
of Story. http://heartcorps.com/dramatica/dramatica_theory_book/chapter_16.html
Sassone, Bob. "10 Tips for Writing Your Mystery." http://www.poewar.com/articles/writing_your_mystery.htm
Writing Coach. "Give Your Plot Motion: A Writing Class Transcript."
Shane Wiebe is an instructor in Human Kinetics at Trinity Western
University (Langley, BC, Canada). He is author of the mystery/thriller,
Into the Eyes of Payne, published by American Book Publishers. See http://www.shanewiebe.com/ for more details.
|
|
Site
design jasonnolan.net
|